The Bio-Logic Understanding of Epidemic Polio

Motor paralysis is the result of a lesion impacting the motor cortex of the cerebral cortex, triggered by a “flight conflict” that initiates a meaningful biological special program.

This biological response occurs when escaping a “predator” is no longer possible, and the body resorts to a death-feigning reflex as a last resort to survive a life-threatening or seemingly fatal situation. The predator is typically someone or something that holds us in check or exerts power over us. Thus, the individual feels like prey or a victim in the situation.

(You can read more about paralysis here.)

When paralysis affects a child, the conflict is either experienced by the child themselves or by their mother, and the child adopts it for survival purposes, to serve them in the current situation and protect their life in the future.

If paralysis is “epidemic,” it means that the emotion of “inability to escape” is experienced by large groups of people.

 

In the United States, a major epidemic is noted in 1952, and in Hungary, in 1957. To understand this, we must examine the events of those times.

 

Hungary’s Situation at the End of 1956

In Hungary, on October 23, 1956, the revolution and freedom fight broke out for the country’s independence and the withdrawal of Soviet troops. It appeared to succeed by October 30, with the reorganization of the country beginning. However, behind the façade of Soviet troop withdrawal, additional divisions were deployed, and on November 4, they attacked with overwhelming force, crushing Hungarian resistance by November 12 and occupying the country.
A brutal retaliation followed against those involved in the revolution, prompting masses of people to flee the country.

The United States’ Situation in the Early 1950s

In the early 1950s, Senator Joseph Raymond McCarthy launched a “witch hunt” in the United States against communists and those suspected of communism. People were accused without evidence, labeled as communists, and faced imprisonment as retaliation. Those unwilling to cooperate with the House Un-American Activities Committee often lost their jobs and endured constant harassment. Prejudices were so rampant that citizens with roots in socialist countries were automatically branded as communists. In some cases, authorities used coercion to extract confessions, leading many to falsely implicate friends or relatives out of fear.

 

Recalling the historical events in the United States and Hungary, we might wonder: Why did paralysis, of all things, manifest en masse? Why was this specific biological response triggered to address the situation?

Examining the nature of the flight conflict, it’s clear that it always involves facing an overwhelmingly powerful force where fighting offers no chance of victory (or even survival) and escape is impossible.

No matter what we do, no matter how we respond, it only worsens the situation. The only biologically appropriate response is to remain still, to “play dead”—because if we’re “already dead,” there’s no need for further harm, pursuit, or torment.

This energetic background was strongly present in both cases.

 

So, What Causes Epidemics to End? And What Role Do Vaccines Play?

 

An epidemic ends when the feeling of fear subsides, meaning:
  • We find a solution to our problem—for example, in the case of a flight conflict and (childhood) paralysis, escaping the threatening environment, such as moving to another country.
  • The problem ceases—the “predator” or oppressive power disappears.
  • We grow accustomed to and accept the situation, resigning ourselves to it.

 

In the case of (publicized or propagated) epidemics or confronting a “disease,” there’s always the potential for secondary conflicts.

In this context, people aren’t only fleeing the primary conflict caused by the societal situation but also the resulting condition—in this case, the perceived “infection” with the poliovirus and paralysis. If we feel unable to escape “infection” or “the clutches of the disease,” it can similarly result in paralysis.

The Role of Vaccines

Since (natural) conditions only arise from biological conflicts, the severity depends on the conflict’s duration and the intensity of the emotions experienced. Microorganisms are part of the regeneration process, so vaccines generally don’t play a role in preventing epidemic spread, with one exception: they can provide reassurance to those specifically fearing the secondary conflict of infection.

In epidemics, a vaccine is like a “magic stone” claimed to protect us from harm as long as we possess it.

As long as someone fully believes in its “magic power” and trusts it provides protection, it can eliminate the “fear of infection” associated with the disease from their conflicts. But this only applies to that specific fear and only until the slightest doubt creeps in or they encounter information contradicting their belief, at which point the placebo effect is lost.

Thus, this only addresses the fear of infection, as the individual’s belief eliminates that fear, and without emotion, there’s no condition.

However, if the individual has any other unresolved conflict related to the disease, the associated symptoms will still appear.
If someone develops a flight conflict for any other reason, paralysis will still be the outcome.

For example, paralysis symptoms attributed to vaccine side effects are often caused by “fear of mandatory vaccination” or “attempting to escape mandatory vaccination.”

In short, rather than neutralizing conditioned beliefs with new ones, it’s simpler and more rational to dismantle them by understanding biological natural laws. With experiential knowledge of this framework, we can not only free ourselves from fears of infections but also shed all fears of diseases and understand their origins.
Whether we possess a “magic stone” or not will no longer influence us.

 

This text does not aim to be comprehensive; it touches on only part of the topic and serves to understand the biological processes occurring within us and the nature of conflicts. Every person’s life and life path are unique, so the specific triggers should be examined individually, based on the events experienced. How someone copes with their conflicts varies from person to person, and different areas are handled differently depending on the amount of negative experiences or failures accumulated there. Exploring a conflict does not replace medical care.
Articles you might interested in:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Thank you for visiting me! If you have any questions, you can reach me at the following places:

IMPORTANT LINKS

Data processing informationArticlesCoursesConsultationContactAbout me
© Copyright 2017-2025 - Noémi Elek - All rights reserved.
envelope-ophonetwitteryoutube-playpaper-plane