Stroke? Brain Hemorrhage? Or Paralysis?

To understand the bio-logical background of a stroke, we must first grasp the perspective of conventional medicine and its contradictions.

The term "stroke" refers to a "cerebral vascular catastrophe."

This concept is divided into two categories:

  1. Ischemic stroke (also called cerebral infarction), where it’s assumed that a blockage in a cerebral artery causes a blood supply disruption to a specific brain area, leading to various functional impairments or damage.
  2. Brain hemorrhage (hemorrhagic stroke), where blood leaking from a damaged cerebral artery harms brain tissue.
According to conventional medicine, not every stroke is a brain hemorrhage, but every brain hemorrhage is a stroke.

The situation is different when thinking bio-logically.

Starting with the latter, in the case of a brain hemorrhage, blood leaking from damaged cerebral arteries causes symptoms. Depending on where in the brain this occurs and which relays are affected, it can lead to functional impairments in the body, such as sensory or motor paralysis, dizziness, coordination issues, or visual disturbances.

Vascular damage can occur when we repeatedly cycle in and out of a self-devaluation conflict related to obstruction, causing the arterial wall to lose elasticity, thin out, and become more prone to injury.

A self-devaluation conflict affecting cerebral arteries arises in situations where we feel obstructed or hindered in relation to our mind, knowledge, thinking, or intellect.

For example, feeling “treated as stupid,” “feeling stupid,” or “unable to understand something.”

In the case of ischemic stroke, however, the situation is entirely different from what conventional medicine claims.

If it were true that a blockage in a specific artery section causes immediate functional impairments, life-saving surgeries where half of the brain’s blood supply (e.g., one carotid artery) is completely blocked—on the grounds that the other side ensures the brain’s nourishment—wouldn’t be possible. Yet, these procedures are performed, and patients do not suffer the symptomatic damage associated with a stroke diagnosis.

(When an artery is blocked, surrounding vessels take over the blood supply to the affected organs or tissues.)

Every symptom associated with cerebral infarction has a cause and background rooted in a triggered biological conflict. Here, I’ll focus on muscle paralysis.

To understand symptoms involving muscle paralysis, it’s helpful to know how muscles are innervated.

The control center for the nourishment and tissue volume of striated muscles is located in the white matter of the brain, while the center for muscle movement is in the motor cortex, within the cerebral cortex.
If the white matter’s tissue nourishment center is affected by a brain event, the muscle begins to atrophy but continues to function, and motor paralysis does not occur.
However, if the motor cortex is affected—and not due to pressure from blood from a vascular injury or surrounding edema on the motor cortex’s relevant relay—then motor paralysis results from a biological conflict impacting the motor cortex.

Paralysis does not involve muscle tissue atrophy, only natural degradation from disuse.

Motor paralysis is the result of a lesion in the motor cortex’s motor field, triggered by a “flight conflict” as part of a meaningful biological special program.

This biological response occurs when there’s no other way to escape a “predator” except through a death reflex, a last resort to survive a life-threatening or seemingly fatal situation. The predator is typically someone or something that holds us in check, exerts power over us (or we place above ourselves). In animals, this is the top of the food chain or hierarchically above the affected individual. In such situations, the individual feels like prey or a victim.

Overall, this means that ischemic strokes are essentially biological conflicts impacting the motor cortex (or relays associated with the symptoms), (rarely caused by brain edema or brain tissue affecting the relevant relays,) and not the result of a vascular catastrophe.

 

Thus, if we stick to the literal meaning of the term, only a brain hemorrhage could be called a stroke (a cerebral vascular catastrophe).
Or…

Thinking backward—taking the cerebral origin of symptoms as a basis—we could say that every biological conflict causing an organ change, i.e., every condition not resulting from an accident, injury, or poisoning, is a small stroke.

This text does not aim to be comprehensive; it touches on only part of the topic and serves to understand the biological processes occurring within us and the nature of conflicts. Every person’s life and life path are unique, so the specific triggers should be examined individually, based on the events experienced. How someone copes with their conflicts varies from person to person, and different areas are handled differently depending on the amount of negative experiences or failures accumulated there. Exploring a conflict does not replace medical care.
Articles you might interested in:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Thank you for visiting me! If you have any questions, you can reach me at the following places:

IMPORTANT LINKS

Data processing informationArticlesCoursesConsultationContactAbout me
© Copyright 2017-2025 - Noémi Elek - All rights reserved.
envelope-ophonetwitteryoutube-playpaper-plane